The Labour party and Agenda 2030.

Socialism has a new name: 'sustainable development'

At which point are people going to realise that the most terrifying thing about this Labour government is that they have no intention of getting reelected? Their loveless landslide propelled by 20% of the vote is here to propel the UN’s Agenda 2030 objectives directly into the heart of our lives, before they disappear into the Lords with gold-plated pensions. And for the few that can write a sentence, newspaper columns and after dinner talks. David Lammy and Angela Rayner likely to be popular on April fools day; book now to avoid disappointment.

Free-Gear Starmer arrived on the back of the Conservative Party’s socialistic failures to deliver the real thing; state intervention pumped on global steroids. Rachel Thieves hanging up the portrait of the British Communist party’s founder in her office told us all we needed to know; that her policies are in keeping with the globalist agenda, and that she’s an idiot.

Agenda 2030 is the sort of thing that when mentioned in normal circles causes glances at the nearest exit, as though the UN’s agenda for the planet is a conspiracy theory, rather than supranational policy that has underpinned national governments since at least the Lima agreement in 1977. In a perfect example of why writing your own press release is always a bad idea, the World Economic Forum calls Agenda 2030 ‘arguably the greatest-ever human endeavour undertaken to create peaceful, just, equal and sustainable societies.’ That’s a new way of saying it’s the sort of heavier governance that invariably increases human misery.

You can throw a dart blindly at any Agenda 2030 declarations and hit sentences like: We envisage a world free of poverty, hunger, disease and want, where all life can thrive. We envisage a world free of fear and violence. How do they intend to eradicate ‘want’? Is desire also in the line-up to be vaporised? And their intention to remove human emotions such as fear is ironically terrifying. If we’re fearful of their authoritarian interventions will they kindly self-destruct? Are they claiming that they’ll kill every house spider in the world so we can live without fear?

Agenda 2030 is an agreement by 197 UN countries who carelessly forgot to consult their electorates. It underpins far more national and local politics than the inattentive bystander might realise. It was born from the shady Club of Rome (of which Starmer is a member), and is the pursuit of global solutions for local problems. As they say ‘transforming our world’. What they mean is your word, not theirs. We already see Labour intending to remove local democratic power from councils with its proposals to overhaul the planning system.

Agenda 2030 wishes to eradicate extreme global poverty, which is socialism wearing a jauntier hat. As ever with socialism they mean making everyone poor, in this case via heavy taxation, targeting family-owned businesses, appropriation of farmland, deindustrialisation, mass immigration, ever-increasing pubic sector burden upon the employed, infantilisation of education, redistribution of wealth by foreign aid, unsustainable public debt and national health services, and the bankrupting machinations of Net Zero. If everyone is poor then they’ve successfully eradicated ‘extreme’ poverty. As with Lenin, the carrion was always ‘land to the peasants’. It’s now been modified to ‘sustainability’ that appears in the media and political diatribes with the frequency of exiting Taylor Swift boyfriends.

Last month, the Climate Change Committee quango said our meat and dairy consumption needs to be halved by 2050 to meet Net Zero, with the intention of replacing beef, lamb and dairy by ‘new diets’. Then there is an intended 45% cut in building materials such as cement, along with a similar reduction in road freight traffic and car usage via 15 minute cities and ULEZ schemes - of which the new Transport Secretary is predictably a keen advocate. The attack on farming will be remorseless with fertiliser restriction halving “direct emission” from the soil. This week Bovaer is being fed to cattle to reduce their farts by 27% because that’s right, cows’ methane is leading to higher global temperatures, rather than the junk data from temperature stations at the end of RAF runways and edging urban heat islands. Maligning cattle as the villains is ideal if they want us to cut out beef and milk. It’s the classic nudge.

Just as the song you’re thinking is shit is invariably Ed Sheehan, State meddling is generally a result of Agenda 2030. They even want energy use to be reduced by 33% by 2050, which will probably be due to lack of availability on windless dark days rather than people opting for candles through lifestyle choice. It’s also a poor measurement of the health of an industrialised nation and the lack of fireplaces in new-builds and flats means a helpless dependency on State heat provision. Add in food, holiday and travel restrictions, and your smile will melt slowly from your face.

They want us so hungry and cold and poor so that we clamour for more of the State authoritarianism that led into this mess. Starmer was quite clear about this in his Great Reset speech in the rose garden - more state inventions.

With co2 linking to global warming being far from settled, we are imposing an intended global policy upon what increasingly appears to be solely the UK, which contributes 1% of global emissions. You can polish off the dust, but the car colour remains the same; cutting UK CO2 emissions is the same thing.

Long term is not part of Labour’s plan. They’ve scored more own goals than Sunday league and they don’t care. There’s been better dressed litter pick days than the Labour front bench; a brigade of the embittered and snide; pumped up with zealotry and lacking any humility or humanity. Most haven’t ever had proper employment. Some, at best, may have pulled a reliable public sector salary in a job that no one notices when you go on holiday. Those that have had jobs have lied on their CVs without apology. The UN globalist membership pack includes more than a badge and pens, but apparently an entitlement that elevates its members above everyday morals in the name of their crusade.

The Labour party are so enthusiastic in its pursuit of Agenda 2030 goals that it sent 470 delegates to COP29 to deride counties leaving a carbon footprint while spending tax payers cash on 2.3 million air miles and trailing at least 338 tons of CO₂ from the 5,000-mile round trip. These are delegates that without their lanyard badges probably don’t know what they are.

Despite the shambolic recent COP, the world is actually moving away from removing hydrocarbons from a modern economy because they are sorely inadequate for reliable energy production. However, this does nothing to deter Herr Starmer and Miliband from removing the 40% - 45% of fossil energy fuelling our electricity grid by 2030 somehow without increasing nuclear power. This means the UK, a country no longer consisting of a pre-war enthusiasm for turning lights off when leaving rooms, must reduce energy demand by 30%. and fill the deficit by more demonic wind ‘farms’. Good luck telling that to teenagers running SpaceX levels of energy usage to hatch virtual eggs overnight in whatever computer game they’re playing rather than falling out of trees.

At least the middle classes who voted for Labour because the Guardian and the school-run chat demanded them to, are now having to foot the bill with increased council tax and cost of living to pay for Labour enforcing employers to increase NI contributions . It’s a shame that those who didn’t vote for socialists aren’t exempt from the rampant theft manoeuvres on the UK working population. Voting socialists into power is like locking mice in the larder; eventually there’s nothing left. It’s working people obliged to pay for the NHS with its bloated middle management, £2 toilet rolls, wards heated to 27 degrees, or hiring 15 community staff from abroad, paying for flights, accommodation for two months and HCPC registration etc. only to realise that none of them could drive. True story.

As with all social movements Agenda 2030 occupies the school curriculum with the sort of diverse thought last seen in lemmings. The Gov.uk website isn’t shy in stating the Dept of Indoctrination - sorry, Education - has an important role to play in all aspects of sustainability. Climate adaptation and decarbonisation activity in nurseries, schools, colleges, universities and care buildings provides powerful learning in the drive to achieve Net Zero. Probably even in Maths - You give 6 carbon credits to your friend who has already spent his on the weekly quota of meat. In how many minutes will the police be arriving at your door to question you? - Another question worth asking is: for how many days will the farming inheritance tax pay for the NHS heating bills with the windows open? We give away over £10 billion a year in foreign aid. This farming tax won't even raise half a billion a year, which rather suggests a state sponsored land grab.

Another UN initiative is Replacement Migration, which encourages international migration to countries with indigenous populations in decline and ageing. The relentless propaganda of ‘toxic’ masculinity, the erosion of religion, traditional values and the family, in favour of (ironically) the individual and promotion of the childless LGBT soup alongside so-called progressive relationships, all contribute to declining populations. Meanwhile, any criticism of immigration is a non-crime hate incident misdemeanour occurrence, or whatever the fuck stupid word salad they use to scramble our ability to think.

What’s most worrying about the UK leading by example is that other countries are seeing the inadvisability of prioritising international agendas over national and local ones. Anyone with a broken heart will know that charity begins at home; when you hurt it’s harder to find care for others. The Labour party know they have five years, and like officials during the last days of Rome, they will be pilfering the art work and pissing in the fondu for years, while surveying the smouldering wreckage of a country they are proud to declare is destroyed in the name of sustainability.